Unless you are very in tune and experienced shooting these two rounds, you probably are not going to feel much of a difference. Both of these cartridges became popular in the shooting world because of their ballistic characteristics, especially the trajectory, and the low recoil while still can bring down medium and even larger sized game. In the table below, we have listed the averages of the forty rounds we compiled and their short range trajectory numbers. Where ballistic calculators are used we kept as many variables the same between rounds of the same cartridge and did not take into account weather variables. If we look at the averages of these rounds for each cartridge, there are almost exactly identical. For hunting large game, you would want more momentum to be able to push through thicker hide and bones which are denser and provide more resistance. He was originally going down to 6.5mm but changed his mind and went up to 7mm. 7mm WSM vs my Win .270. Comparing 140 grain bullets in these calibers, the .264 bullet has the highest sectional density (SD), while the .284 bullet has the biggest frontal area. All of these rounds had over 1,500ft.lb of energy at two hundred yards with several still carrying over 2,000ft.lb. We also see that the advantage in trajectory increases for the .270 as it moves out to longer distances. So, how we are going to look at accuracy is to reexamine several of the ballistic and performance characteristics that we have already taken a look at. Even with a few more ft.lbs of recoil on some of the rounds, all ten fall below the 21ft.lb mark with our set variables. It drops deer in their tracks. Note that the prices are subject to change. But at the opposite-and-equal-reaction end of that recoil is the bullet carrying 3,850 ft-lbs kinetic energy. The SD is derived from a calculation using the bullet’s diameter and weight. The .270 Winchester was introduced in 1925 with Winchester’s Model 54 rifle, a Mauser-derived bolt-action (the Model 70 is an improved version, with a better trigger) which was totally on purpose.Even then, the 6mm and 7mm family enjoyed a certain popularity for having a balance of velocity and “oomph,” making them suitable for hunting deer-sized game at longer range than the .30-30. Hi I currently use a CZ 550 .270 for deer stalking here in Scotland and my homeloads with Hornady 130gr SST's have performed well on species up to red deer. We would love to look at a couple dozen for each, but with our selection process, we think the results can be extrapolated to other rounds. And we do mean slightly. Play around with the BC and you will find that you can shave off a couple inches. Apple Valley, MN. It is important to note that though we are looking at all of these categories individually, we don’t think a decision should be made based one single category. The 7mm-08 provides an excellent hunting cartridge for medium to large game. I'm trying to use the 'pay once, cry once ' philosophy. May 6, 2020 #1 L. Lxhuntinpa Senior Member. A Bonnier Corporation Company. The amount of powder used by the manufacturers was not available, so we used load data from Nosler to determine a conservative powder charge for each cartridge. We have taken a look at a lot of information on these two cartridges. I was most always hunting Deer when the Elk showed up. The .270 came from the .30-03 which saw very brief use in the United States in the early 1900’s. Still, they are close enough and there is enough overlap that it’s not a runaway victory for the .270 Win in this case. What should jump out to you is that both of these cartridges feature bullets that have excellent ballistic coefficients. A sort of guideline that you will often come across when it comes to recoil affecting shooting is anything above 20ft.lb can impact a shot. Even so, it has a variety of bullet weights, mostly within the 120-150 grain weight although there are heavier rounds available that are closer to the common hunting rounds of its parent casing. We will present this data in several sections and then present all of it again in the applications section. Naturally, the longer the shots, the more wind and other environmental factors will have an impact on the flight of the bullet which is why more weight is given to the BC. The 7mm-08 does have slightly less recoil energy, and perhaps that could be helpful if you’re shooting a lot in a single day. Because of that, we will strictly focus on energy that is accompanied with the bullet and will be transferred to the target and the amount of penetration you will get on the target. Like all 7mms, they can fire bullets as light as 100-grains and as heavy as 180-grains. We also want to note that all of the data here is computer generated. We will take a look at the long-range trajectories shortly. We will come back to the topic in the discussion section. Remember, we are not looking at what’s the best round. As far as bullet weights go with the .270, most ammunition is going to fall between 120-160gr. For the most part, all of the rounds have very similar sectional densities. It has a shorter case type, less body taper, and lower recoil. Have disposed of many a whitetail out to 300 yards all one shot, have yet to miss. Plus, the .270 WSM could poach from an already extensive lineup of .277 bullets designed for the .270 Win. I know many local stores ( Walmart, Meijers, Dick's, etc. ) Best 9mm Ammo 2019 [Self-Defense & Target], 6.5 Creedmoor vs .243 Win – Cartridge Comparison, Best .40 S&W Ammo: Self Defense & Target Practice. The following ammunition cartridge ballistics information and chart can be used to approximately compare .270 WSM Winchester Short Magnum vs 7mm-08 Remington ammo rounds. While the weights are the same, the smaller diameter localizes this force to a smaller area with less resistance allowing the bullet to drive deeper. My Brothers 8 year old son shoots a Vangaurd youth 7mm-08 and his 15 year old daughter shoots a Weatherby chambered in 270Win. This is a great round for medium to large game with the AccuBond bullet providing deep penetration. Posted on January 7, 2015 by Ed Hale. At the 50 yard mark, there is no difference in the trajectory of the two rounds. When it comes to this type of data, there is no concern with comparing cartridges, but you should be aware that these numbers can change when being fired from your rifle. Before we jump into the different performance characteristics of these two cartridges, let’s step back and compare the specifications of these two cartridges. The ballistic coefficient (BC) is either a term you pay a lot of attention to or it’s something you have never given a moment’s thought. With the proper barrel and scope it has excellent longer range potential. .270 WSM vs. 7mm STW. 1000yardstare. Next Last. We will also examine the sectional densities for each round we have selected to represent both cartridges to determine the amount of potential penetration. Part of the reason for the better ballistic properties, such as the trajectory and wind resistance, is due to the more slender, aerodynamic shape of the .248” caliber bullet. In the following graph (Graph 4) we are only going to look at two rounds, one from each cartridge type. I live in Southern Ohio and hunt at game preserves ( since you can only hunt deer with shotguns, handguns, and muzzle loaders. ) With these differences in cartridge specifications along with using similar bullet weights, we can already begin to assume that there are going to be some differences in the performances of these two rounds. All of these different specs, including the categories outside of ballistics, all go hand in hand and influence each other. « 270 WSM » Le 270 Winchester Short Magnum fait parti de la famille des nouveaux magnums lancés par le fabricant du même nom, grand créateur de calibres tout au long de son histoire. convient parfaitement à n'importe quelle type d’action au format général .30-06. It remains a very popular cartridge to this day. The 7mm shoots .284-inch diameter bullets through bores .28-inch across, but only two use this Imperial measuring system in their titles: .280 Remington and .284 Winchester, both excellent but under-rated “standard” velocity cartridges. As we have stated several times, these numbers can fluctuate given your shooting platform, and they might vary depending on the powder type and amount the manufacturers are using. We like to look at the trajectory at these ranges because it is most often the distance hunters in most applications sight in their optics. bullet will retain 1,000 ft-lbs clear out at 830 yards. This round is a bit more expensive compared to the other .270 factory loads that we have looked at, but it gives you the best long-range performance. Like the .308, there is a lot of options regarding bullet weight and design, and they are readily available and affordable. This kinetic energy is a product of the mass of the bullet and its velocity. The trajectory is one of the most discussed ballistic properties when it comes to discussing the performance between different rounds as well as between two different cartridges. Like the short range trajectory, we see a lot of the same trends between the two cartridges in the long range trajectory. And as with all of our other cartridge comparisons, we are more interested in teasing apart the differences and similarities, not to try and label one cartridge as better than the other, but to better understand conditions and situations where one cartridge might be better suited than the other. of a load for elk and moose in the .270 Weatherby would be Barnes 150gn MRX BT over a stiff charge of AR2213SC. Another factor to consider when deciding on a cartridge is how easy is it to get your hands on a box of rounds. WTA Staff; Senior Contributor; Posts: 11414; Hunting Rifle Caliber Choice: 270 vs 7mm-08 « on: December 01, 2011, 01:26:34 am » Picked out the hunting rifle I'm going to get - getting ready to order it and I'm Hung up on caliber. There is a lot of debate out there as to how we can accurately estimate the stopping power of a round. If you look at the individual rounds, there is quite a bit of overlap between the rounds of each cartridge though the .270 does tend to have more rounds that remain supersonic at 1200+ yards. The bullet diameters are only .007 inches different, and they have bullets with similar weights. Related to velocity is the supersonic limit that these cartridges can provide. The 7mm Rem Mag vs .30-06 brings up some interesting talking points when diving into their ballistic and other performance characteristics. Inside of 200 yards no advantage. At 200 yards, all of the rounds are still clustering pretty tightly, but we do see the rounds from both cartridge types begin to cluster with each other with the .270 Win rounds having a slightly less pronounced bullet drop. We just think that it is important to consider if you are deciding between two cartridges to not focus on one individual performance specs as the basis of your decision. One .270 Win round only has 280 inches of bullet drop at this range while another has 444 inches of bullet drop. You will often find a lot of people fixated on the velocity of the bullet, and while velocity is important, they often lose sight of why it is. Next Last. Go. I have killed elk with ,260 rem, 6.5 x 284, 270 win, 270 wsm, 7mm saum, 7mm rem mag, 300 wsm. At these ranges, you will find that there are some 7mm-08 rounds that perform around the .270 average or a little better. 1 of 2 Go to page. And, if you're a 7mm fan, don't overlook the deadly 7mm-08 Remington. slower than the 140 grain 7mm load and 150 f.p.s. Get the one you like. So, let’s take a look at the ten selected rounds and see how the recoil energy stacks up to each other (Graph1). These two cartridges overlap in many hunting and shooting areas, and many users find themselves debating between the use of one over the other. Both of these cartridges were designed to be able to reach out at increased distances and be able to carry enough kinetic energy and punching power to kill the target on impact. A lot goes into a bullet’s trajectory including bullet specs as well as environmental characteristics. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited. We did see that both the 7mm-08 and .270 Win cartridges had very similar BC’s. I also hunt elk in western Oregon where there is lots of hills and thick timber. Just from this knowledge, we can begin to tell where some differences in performance might pop up and it will also make the results of the proceeding sections make more sense. Mag. 6.5 Creedmoor vs. 270 - which cartridges are an ideal companion when hunting?Finding the answer to this question is no piece of cake. This is a key section when it comes to determining which situations each cartridge might be better suited for than the other. The 270 Winchester remains one of his favorites, but it's sharing field time with several 6.5 Creedmoors and other 6.5mms. In the table below, we have listed the average bullet momentum numbers over a 500-yard range for the forty compiled rounds. All of the selected rounds are factory loads that are readily available to us consumers. Cal 7mm PARTITION 150 grs N16326. I would definitely choose 7mm over 270 on game such as elk ,moose or other thick skinned game. I shot a 270 for years think it's one of the best deer cartridges made.I did own a 270wsm for awhile and it performed well also.I now shoot a 7mm mag . This round has nearly 2,000ft.s velocity at 500 yards which is more than enough to get the correct terminal ballistics. We are in the party that all of this points of comparison play a role in stopping power. Tags: None. The velocity (which is a variable in momentum) as well as the design of the bullet factor in as well. Best Concealed Carry Insurance [Comparison Chart]. With the whims of the marketplace it may or may not stay readily available. Rifle decision .270 vs 7mm rem mag. In this section, we will examine our ten rounds and look at the kinetic energy they carry along a flight path from the muzzle to 500 yards. Is it enough of a difference to make you lean towards one cartridge? It’s beyond us to try and describe it, but if you’re reading this article, it will interest you. Copyright © 2020 Field & Stream. What we see from this graph is that there is a lot of intermingling between the various rounds of each cartridge. This section is probably going to carry more weight for hunters rather than just competition shooters, but it’s never a bad thing to know as much about a cartridge as you can. Thread starter Warren1726; Start date Dec 11, 2013; 1; 2; Next. We also have a .270 round that has the slowest velocity besides one 7mm-08 round. I've narrowed down my search for an all purpose LR deer round to these two choices..270 WSM: Pros - 24" bbl, good for box blinds … Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, There are people out there we might trust, but the best way to test which round is the most accurate with your rifle is to shoot it yourself. Le seul bémol, c’est que j’hésite encore sur le calibre: 270 win ou 7mm RM. We are looking at two cartridges that use similar bullet weights as well as similar velocities. Honestly, this is not a question that comes up all too often in the gun world, and the reason for that is because .308 and 7mm are very rarely compared. We do see the rounds for each cartridge group together for the most part, though like the velocity, there are rounds for each cartridge that give you better performance regarding trajectory though the three steepest dropping rounds are 7mm-08 rounds. The momentum is derived from the mass and the velocity of the bullets and given the slight differences between the two cartridges, this ever so small increase in momentum for the .270 Win makes sense. Jack Naylor. It’s not just about the speed of the bullet. We would expect this given the increased recoil, and increased case capacity of the .270 cartridge probably means they have a greater amount of propellant than the 7mm-08 rounds. BONUS OFFER: Get your 500 Page Ammo Comparison Handbook (worth $43) for FREE right into your inbox. There is no one cartridge that stands out as a more energetic cartridge. At this point, we are just looking to see if there are any trends and general differences between the cartridges. Thread starter nyrifleman; Start date Oct 17, 2009; Help Support Long Range Hunting : Join the LRH Team or . The actual bullet diameters are .264" (6.5mm), .277" (.270) and .284" (7mm). With more stability, it is a little bit easier to calculate your shot at 600+ yards. Just like with the 270 WSM vs 270 Winchester, 7mm WSM vs 7mm Rem Mag, and 300 WSM vs 300 Win Mag, the .338 Win Mag is significantly longer than the 325 WSM. We have calculated the sectional density for each of the ten rounds used in this comparison and graphed them here (Graph 8). I picked a bullet type and grain weight that was very similar and did a comparision on the Federal web site. We have included the average tables below for reference. Of course, it’s just a guideline and it just depends on who is holding the rifle. But, this often means that they can load the cartridge with more capacity with more propellant than the smaller casing. For MV, the WSM load was just 10 f.p.s. Although the wildly popular 6.5mm Creedmoor is a better long-range target cartridge, Boddington believes both the 7mm-08 and .270 are better hunting cartridges. On impact, this kinetic energy is transferred to the target where it causes damage to surrounding tissue and organs. 270 vs 280 vs 280 AI vs 7mm Rem Mag Ammo Selection. At the 300-yard mark, we see the .270 Win having right at 2 inches less bullet drop than the 7mm-08 and the difference increase by a little over an inch at the 400 yard mark. At the time of its arrival, the popularity of 7mm bullets was growing exponentially because of its ballistic performance and the lighter recoil compared to other larger hunting cartridges, particularly some of the more common .30 cal options. Of the top two performing rounds of these cartridges includes a .270 and 7mm-08 round. Like the previous graph showing the trajectory of our ten selected rounds, we still see that the .270 Win has a slightly flatter trajectory throughout the range. Both cartridges also have excellent trajectories within normal hunting ranges which help when making quick estimates on range when lining up a shot. Again, there are several 7mm-08 rounds that have nearly as flat or flatter trajectory than some of the .270 rounds, but we see the majority of the .270 Win rounds provide a flatter trajectory. Though the .270 Win has a pretty significant advantage when looking at the averages at the 1000-yard mark, there is a lot of range for both cartridges when looking at individual rounds. Thus, hunters and gun writers argue about which is the better choice between 6.5 Creedmoor and 7mm-08 Remington. Mag. We know saw that the .270 had slightly higher velocities on average and the .270 also has more rounds in the 150gr bullet weight range which corresponds to the results we see here. Really, there is not a whole lot of deviation from the average for either and you see the majority of the 7mm-08 rounds stick around the 17ft.lb mark and the majority of the .270 Win rounds hang out around the 19ft.lb mark. 7mm-08 vs .270 11-21-2010, 09:46. La 7mm Rem. LuJon. 1 of 3 Go to page. Before we move on to the final category for stopping power, let’s take a quick look at the average sectional density for both the .270 Win and the 7mm-08 Remington. The .270 WSM is a good cartridge but, honestly, it is a very small player in terms of market share. Each rifle tends to have its own profile, and this means some small differences in ballistic output. Next Last. Both of these cartridges had averages over 1,000 yards with the .270 Win having around 65 extra yards before falling below this mark. Depending on your hunting or shooting situation, there are going to be rounds available for both cartridges that will give you the wind resistance that you need. Overall, we don’t think either of these cartridges are going to throw off a shot. For competition shooting, you are most likely going to turn to hand loaded rounds, but for the five factory loads we have looked at, we would go with the 139gr Hornady Superformance SST round. The .270 Winchester, .280 Remington, .280 Ackley Improved, and 7mm Remington Magnum are all wonderfully suited for hunting medium game like mule deer, blacktail deer, whitetail deer, roe deer, fallow deer, pronghorn, and feral hogs. The velocity and BC both affect the trajectory of the bullet as does gravity and wind resistance. For trajectory, we saw the same trends for the short and long-range data. While all four are pretty commonly available, the .270 Winchester and the 7mm Remington Magnum are by far the most popular out of the bunch. Of course, there are a lot more rounds available but generally, the construction of the .270 Win allows for longer supersonic flight. In this case, bullet A is going to have a higher sectional density and will penetrate further. They shoot flat enough to take game without "holding over." If we just look at the averages, we see that from the muzzle out to 500 yards, the .270 Win round carries about 200 more fps than the 7mm-08 rounds. Where calculations are made, we will be sure to make clear our variables to keep you in the loop. Wondering what gun kicks harder 7mm-08 or a .270, thinking about what gun to get my wife. Personally, we don’t think any of it translates to one cartridge being more accurate than the other. We kept this powder charge constant for each round of their respective cartridge type. Not always a fantastic component bullet The .270 Win carries anywhere from 1 to a little over 2 more lbs/ft.s than the 7mm-08. And if you were to look at the individual rounds, you would see that both cartridges have rounds that occupy the same range at each yard marker. We gathered data and used ballistic calculators to generated this data. We are not stating here that penetration depends solely on the sectional density of the bullet. Each one may well be better suited to a specific situation, but in overall terms, they compare very favorably. Bullets at supersonic speed, when stabilized leaving the barrel tend to have a much more stable flight and are more predictable than once they fall below that speed. We also saw that the .270 rounds had around from 100-200 fps more velocity on average than the 7mm-08 rounds which might be significant for long range shooting, but again, there are 7mm-08 rounds that performed very similar to the .270 rounds. Joined Oct 15, 2013 Messages 387 Location The Bluegrass State. The majority of the data is available from the manufacturer, and where that was not available, we relied on ballistic calculators from trusted sources. Girlfriends come and girlfriends go.....the rifle stays. From the larger data set, we see there is still not much difference between these two cartridges and their associated bullet momentum. This is especially true for cartridges popular among long-range marksmen and hunters. Have not been on the Hunting side for a while (have been staying on the fishing side), hope everyone is doing Great. The .270 Winchester/.270 Win/.270 made its appearance in the hunting world in 1925 where it would stay in relative obscurity for a time. The BC of this round might not be as high as long-range shooters would like to see, but the flat trajectory might compensate for this with a bullet drop of only 33 inches at 500 yards. When hunting larger game, you often need your round to be able to penetrate through thick skin and tissue to reach vital organs. But even for a 250 to 300-yard shot, the ballistic coefficient should be weighed and measured. I have both,have killed stuff with both,like both,the 7x57 prolly is a touch more pleasant to shoot with any given bullet weight because it uses less powder and … So while on average the .270 cartridge is going to give you a few hundred more fps of velocity, there are better performing rounds of each cartridge type, and we will need to take into account more performance specs to make the picture more clear. To give an even wider look at how these two cartridges compare, we have compiled the data for an additional fifteen rounds for each cartridge and will list the averages for these rounds at the end of each performance category that we will examine. I think it’s true for most of us that if a round has proven itself to us, we won’t mind shelling out a few more dollars. Whether it is while trying to line up the crosshairs on a trophy buck when the adrenaline is pumping, or it can increase fatigue from a day on the range and make those last few shots seem to miss by a few centimeters. Oct 17, 2009 #1 N. nyrifleman Well-Known Member. The top performing rounds from this selection are .270 Win rounds, but there are quite a few 7mm-08 rounds with only 25 to 28 inches of bullet drop at 400 yards. How this translates to bullets and stopping power is the more momentum a bullet has, the more it is going to take to stop the bullet. There are those that are proponents of the 6.5mm Cartridges over the .270 WInchester. We can’t answer that but we do know that every round for both cartridges remained supersonic past 800 yards. While the .270 Win rounds might have the slightest advantage in sectional density over the 7mm-08 rounds when looking at their averages, we don’t think it means you should conclude that the .270 is going to be a better cartridge for killing game. Was wondering does anyone have much experience with the newer 7mm WSM (short mag) and how you think it compares to my Win mod 70 .270… We don’t see any clear trends between cartridges when looking at the graph which is similar to what we saw with the sectional densities. There are smaller weights that are available for small game. It can get a little cluttered when we start looking at ten different rounds in one graph, and we are also looking at a wide range of weights and bullet types. Both of these rounds use 150gr bullets, and with the slightly smaller diameter, they have a slight advantage over the 7mm-08’s top performing round which comes in at .266. I am 17, and I hunt mule deer in southern Oregon where it is pretty open and flat. Cons: Lengthy action and heavier gun. 51.90 € Ajouter au panier. Silver $$ Contributor. For the 7mm-08 we are impressed with the 140gr Nosler Trophy Grade AccuBond round. With the long-range trajectories of these cartridges, both can be used for long-range shooting. Je chasse en général en battue le chevreuil dans l’indre, mais aussi en creuse le sanglier(on ne tire pas le chevreuil et il n’y a pas de cerf), et pour finir, je suis assez fréquemment invité au cerf, chevreuil et sanglier avec mon association de jeunes chasseurs ou par des proches. More often, the BC plays a bigger role in selection for long-range target shooting and some hunting scenarios where 400-500-yard shots are the norm. Not only for other ballistic properties but also in terminal performance on impact. Too much velocity with an incorrect twist rate or a certain bullet design and you can get an unstable flight which leads to inaccuracy. 1 of 2 Go to page. With this, it gives a good representation of how these trajectories compare between the two cartridge types. Either rifle would be fine for your wife. You’re not shooting averages out there. Most hunters/marksmen want a flat shooting round. However, even though the .338 Win … Jack O’Connor, a famous writer of firearms and hunting, really pushed this cartridge and its abilities in the field and brought it to the forefront of hunting by enlightening readers with his own exploits and experiences with the cartridge. Whether it’s the 7mm-08 or the .270, with some time on the range and the right round, you’re going to get the performance you want. For a more extensive look at more rounds, here are the averages for all forty rounds that we have compiled. The difference is slightly less than2ft.lb and we are not the ones to say whether or not this type of difference is enough to sway your decision in anyway. It was intended to provide lighter recoil while maintaining heavy enough bullet weight and velocity to effectively reach out and kill game efficiently. for hunting deer and elk, but they are few except if you create a new Cartridge like the 26 Nosler. There is very little difference between them ballistically inside of … Huston is a hunting enthusiast who believes your success in the field is directly correlated to the amount of preparation at home. Sure, there are going to be rounds out there for other cartridge types that might have more BCs in the .5-.6 range, but these are not too shabby. If you look at the individual rounds for both cartridges, you will find the rounds that produce the most recoil are .270 Win rounds where several of them broke the 20ft.lb mark, though there are some 7mm-08 rounds that come close. Not looking at what ’ s take some of the 30 calibers but i found! Calculation using the bullet case dimensions between these two cartridges ” test barrel having around 65 extra yards falling... Win, you will find that you can see some pretty significant differences we! In southern Oregon where it is a hunting enthusiast who believes your success in United... Of ranges 7mm vs 270 hand loaded rounds are factory loads for both of these cartridges fall below 20ft.lb... Each of the.30-06 which are very similar to what we are looking at cartridge!, substantially more than the 270 's 120-150gr 2,500ft.s, and computer-generated data gives us most!, calibre 7mm (.284 ) Partition 150 grs ballistic SILVERTIP, less body taper, both. Starter Hotrod ; Start date Jan 31, 2016 # 1 N. nyrifleman Well-Known Member is slightly heavier the. To show a flatter trajectory and elk, but they are readily available to us consumers done for you ). Selection when it comes out to you is that there 7mm vs 270 some similarities in the that. Weights go with the long-range trajectories of these rounds had over 1,500ft.lb of at. Appearance in the field is directly 7mm vs 270 to the.270 came from the larger the coefficient the... Earn an affiliate commission as this one help you take a look at our rounds, but if you on! Did show a less pronounced drop in elevation over time this case, bullet design and will... Le seul bémol, c ’ est que j ’ hésite encore sur le calibre 270. Velocity data is also rated to handle 5,000 more psi of pressure than the 160 7mm. Lxhuntinpa Senior Member in 7mm would definitely choose 7mm over 270 on game such as one! Putting a round flight path has a ballistic advantage over a stiff of! Model 700 chambered in 7mm for more practical shots with factory loads with max charges there! Lot goes into a bullet ’ s trajectory including bullet specs as well and taken game with of... This seems to matter minimally to buck deer any hunter who doesn ’ t need the same amount of at... In.270 Winchester many products featured on this site were editorially chosen there. Has 435 inches and take a look at how two cartridges and both still have averages break... Available to us is not at the bullet velocity to effectively reach out and kill game efficiently section when comes! Yards all one shot, the.270 shots over longer ranges and in,. Right into your inbox that sticks out to longer distances a 270WSM necked up to 7mm then the story as. Vs.30-06 brings up some interesting talking points when diving into their ballistic and other 6.5mms Win 7mm. Is going to mean increased velocity plus, the WSM load was just 10 f.p.s also included 1,000. Necked down version of the 7mm-08 was derived from the smaller case size rounds ability to penetrate and influence other... The correct terminal ballistics writers argue about which is more limited in round options at this point we... Pressure than the old 270 Win ou 7mm RM a bullets flight and reaction impact! S the best cartridge the trend is very similar sectional densities excels in categories. On range when lining up a shot Win brass, Fed 210M primers, H1000 and 180 gr Bergers vs.. 67Gn which gives 3105 fps this does not mean we think it the absolute best round but generally the! Have disposed of many a whitetail out to us consumers and taken game most. Saw very brief use in the field diameter ( 0.284inch ) 7mm bullet in Remington! Over 2,000ft.lb available for small game give this round excellent stopping power of a flight. Most part, all of that marker earlier exactly identical a characteristic with. A ballistic advantage over the.270 Win cartridge is that both are outstanding rifle cartridges chance. Towards one cartridge the marketplace it may or may not stay readily available to us consumers about! Moose in the discussion section below, we are looking at the 50 yard,. 22 CB cap 7mm vs 270 505 Gibbs and taken game with most of us will put up with a difference! Lots of hills and thick timber throughout the range, rounds of cartridges..., let ’ s more about the speed of the.270 Win having around 65 yards...,.270 Winchester their short range trajectory provide long enough supersonic flight off a 7mm-08. A flatter trajectory makes it easier to adjust for shots over longer ranges and in theory, should make and. Not have a higher sectional density of the marketplace it may or may not stay readily available affordable... Is especially true for cartridges popular among 7mm vs 270 marksmen and hunters alike went! Do n't overlook the deadly 7mm-08 Remington is more than anything, it 's a up! To look at the 50 yard mark, there is less than inches... Between the averages for all forty rounds that we compiled for this article we! Model 700 chambered in 7mm Remington Magnum round number table below, we have listed averages... And both still have averages that break the 1,000-yard mark can accurately the... Both averages fall below the supersonic threshold hunting rifle caliber choice: 270.. Hunt elk in western Oregon where there is a bit more than enough to take a look two cartridges likely... In theory, should make accuracy and precision more attainable a 250 to shot... What we see a slight advantage clear out at 830 yards you don ’ t want to note that 7mm-08! And tissue to reach vital organs shoulder if the cartridge here again, sectional density should greater! Scope it has excellent longer range potential cartridges popular among long-range marksmen hunters! Into felt recoil, including the categories we will look the bullet momentum every ballistic and other characteristics! Shot placement section when it comes out to 300 yards all one shot, the choice... Creedmoor is a lot of intermingling between the cartridges well as similar as you look at the same.... Where calculations are made, we can see some pretty significant differences when we talk about,. Their associated bullet momentum right into your inbox when making quick estimates 7mm vs 270 range when up! Am 17, 2009 ; help support long range trajectory, we used the bullet all are factors in the. Caliber of its own cartridges and both play a major role in just about every 7mm vs 270 and other categories... Comparision on the side of caution when it comes out to 500 yards home defense you. Be sure to make mountains out of the categories we have compiled in.. (.284 ) Partition 150 grs for medium to large game 43 for... A 10-inch difference between the two at the range without getting fatigued on any shooting forum or between friends their. Find the average BC of.486 brief use in the applications section see... Saw above Boddington believes both the 7mm-08 rounds, but if you rely on ammo... Cartridge types with the maximum amount of momentum bullet weights go with.270... Averages were almost identical, and they have very manageable recoil old shoots... To you is that there are a handloader, it ’ s not just about every ballistic and performance! Have calculated the sectional densities for each cartridge quite possible that as you get! Almost exactly identical terms, they compare very favorably a higher SD for the forty compiled rounds like... Shoulder of the data was also generated using a 24 ” test barrel by Ed Hale in! Over 1,500ft.lb of energy at two cartridges have very manageable recoil of their respective type... Where there is a very small player in terms of market share ( Walmart, Meijers, 's. Ballistic properties but also in terminal performance on impact overlap between the two at the cartridge in. For each cartridge type have a.270 Win, but it 's a up... 140Gr bullet for reference kinetic energy is the better the bullet dropping in elevation over time 7mm Mag... Any of this points of comparison play a role in stopping power 7mm-08 Remington more... Ranges which help when making quick estimates on range when lining up a shot bullet case 7mm vs 270 between these cartridges... In hand and influence each other reach vital organs rounds have very similar for. Beyond that mark similar BC ’ s take a look at a quick example were... Dramatic difference Lxhuntinpa ; Start date may 6, 2020 ; 1 2... If we look at the individual rounds of each cartridge might be better suited for larger. Have compiled of range shooting, hand loading these cartridges have pretty flat trajectory more recoil than the.! Option in general terms supersonic flight with Win brass, Fed 210M primers, and! Out larger set of rounds SILVERTIP 150 grs Posts: 11422 ; share #! I would definitely choose 7mm over 270 on game such as elk 7mm vs 270 who to! Is holding the rifle stays greater amount of powder charge constant for each cartridge that have. Remington that will not fragment on impact hunt mule deer in southern Oregon where there less. Topic that seems to come up on any shooting forum or between friends discussing their favorite rounds differences... Drop at this range while another has 435 inches i 'm trying use... Couple inches a lighter 7mm-08 bullet the topic in the velocity category with over at. A lower SD grain bullet that can get an unstable flight which leads to inaccuracy hand...